Stories & Soliloquies

Stories & Soliloquies
  • About my Soliloquies
  • Metaphysics, Myth, & Magic
  • My Poetry & Fiction
  • Philosopher Fridays
  • The Philosopher’s Lexicon
  • Tag: feminism

    • Mini-Syllabus: Turn of the Century Girlhood in Anglo-American Society

      Posted at 12:00 pm by Michelle Joelle, on May 14, 2015

      A little while ago I came down with a cold and ended up binging on Netflix for a couple of days, watching the entire series of The Paradise, and then following it up with A Room with a View. While both are billed as love stories, I think what I found most interesting about them was their completely unselfconscious treatments of femininity within the very self-aware political landscape the pre-suffrage Edwardian era. It was a time of transition: not yet progressive, but not complacent either.

      Though the stories were set at around the turn of the century and the heart of the “first wave” of feminism, the films were, of course, made by modern minds. My curiosity piqued, I decided to revisit some childhood books that took up the same theme and were written within the time period to see how femininity was treated by its contemporary authors. I decided to give myself some parameters to keep the focus tight; I wanted books that were written around the transitional mood of the turn of the century, focused mainly on girlhood (rather than adulthood), and took up the perspective of E.M. Forster’s England and its colonial off-shoots. The result is a miniature syllabus on how Western culture viewed femininity and, more specifically, girlhood, during the early stages of the feminist movement.

      ______________________________________________________

      Part One: Fiction at the Turn of the Century

      JPoRJ9wR4qPjvs8RAC-6tw

      1) A Room with a View, by E.M. Forster – 1908: Since the movie adaptation of this novel inspired this quest, it seems appropriate to start with the novel itself. Set in both England and Italy, this story is about a young girl starching against the rules of society. This is such a great depiction of the Edwardian era in general; coming on the heels of the Victorian era, the Edwardians were the last great swell of the English aristocracy before it began its slow decline, and in this novel you can almost feel the characters coming to a boil.

      IMG_0163

      2) A Little Princess, by Frances Hodgson Burnett – 1905: This novel is about a little girl who grows up wealthy, but when her father dies is thrown into poverty. This gives us a view not just of the feminine ideal of the Edwardian period, but shows how that ideal was expected to hold up even under the harshest conditions.

      IMG_0160

      3) The Secret Garden, by Frances Hodgson Burnett – 1911: One of my favorite books of all time, this book is an obvious follow up to A Little Princess. Though the story is generally cast as exploration of the joys and powers of nature, femininity is often characterized by interiority (the domestic space), the wildness of nature (nurturing, childbirth, etc.), and mystery (“women’s intuition” and the like). An unkempt, secret, interior garden is such an interesting image through which to cast a young girl’s growth and change over the course of the story.

      Part Two: On the Periphery

      FullSizeRender

      4) Anne of Green Gables, by Lucy Maud Montgomery – 1908: This story jumps us over the pond to Prince Edward Island and into a very different world. PEI was at this time about 40 years removed from British rule, and is in a unique position to tackle the notion of girlhood head on. Anne is notable both for simply being a girl (when the family had specifically requested a boy to work as a farmhand), and for being unusual for a girl – she’s loud and talkative, boisterous and bold.

      IMG_0159

      5) Little Women, by Lousia May Alcott – 1868/1869: Because this story was written and set in the Civil War era of the United States, it shows us a different perspective. Little Women deals with girlhood directly, with each sister offering a different layer of compliance or resistance with the norms of the time.

      FullSizeRender

      6) Little House Books, by Laura Ingalls Wilder – 1932-1943: Although this series is set in the late 19th century American Mid-West, it is written in the voice of the post-suffrage 1930s. Laura Ingall’s hard life of homesteading serves as both a memory of the past and a foil for Depression in the Dust Bowl, effectively bookending feminism’s “first wave”.

      Part Three: Non-Fiction Historical Accounts

      If you’re looking for some broader historical background, these texts are all excellent places to start. The titles are all quite self-explanatory, so you can choose based on your own level of interest. I’ve kept the focus here to the 19th century, with the idea that it sets the stage for the turn of the century attitudes.

      7) Gender Roles in the 19th Century, by Kathryn Hughes

      8) Frances Hodgson Burnett: The Unexpected Life of the Author of the Secret Garden, by Gretchen Holbrook Gerzina

      9) Femininity to Feminism: Women and Literature in the Nineteenth Century (Twayne’s Women and Literature Series) by Susan Rubinow Gorsky

      10) Frontiers of Femininity: A New Historical Geography of the Ninteenth-Century American West (Space, Place, and Society) by Karen M. Professor Morin

      ______________________________________________________

      I know that there is quite a bit missing here, but I wanted to keep the focus as tightly around E.M. Forster’s world as possible. I left out the teens and the 20s, suffrage, anything overtly political, and most notably, non-white perspectives. I have plans for future iterations of this syllabus that will deal with girlhood in other groups, cultures, and time-periods, so if you have any suggestions to add to this list, or for future lists, please feel free to leave links in the comments. As always, be sure to describe your suggestions, as links alone will likely be filtered out as spam by the powers of WordPress.

      Posted in Series | 5 Comments | Tagged books, Edwardian Era, femininity, feminism, girlhood, history, mini-syllabus, reading
    • The Ambiguity of the “Strong Female Character”

      Posted at 11:30 am by Michelle Joelle, on April 16, 2014

      There’s been a lot of discussion about what makes a strong female character. What sounds like a fairly simple idea means something different to nearly every person who uses the term or, in a more problematic way more often than not, brandishes it like a badge of honor. There is no one “true” definition of a “strong female character.” People seem to agree that it’s good to have strong female characters, and that it’s a good thing to work toward having more and better female representation in narrative media, but people don’t often agree on what that means.

      My internet travels last week led me to some really excellent articles about the different forms this question can take. Corsets and Cutlasses raised the question of what “strong” really means, Lady Bee at Disrupting Dinner Parties uses Suzanne Collins’ Divergent as a case study because it does something slightly radical by including more than one token strong woman or girl, Darling Magazine’s Courtney Caggiano looks at the independence of Jo March in Little Women, and Ari Laurel from Be Young and Shut Up takes a closer look at the racial politics of the strong female character in dystopian young adult fiction.

      The point these articles collectively raise is that when we talk about strong female characters, and female character representation in general, we’re really talking about at least two different things:

      1. Female characters who, as people in the world of their story, display strength of some kind. This is the kind of “strong female character” most people refer to when they discuss the topic.
      2. Female characters who, inspite of their personality, circumstances, and in individual prowess, are given strong characterization. Basically, what I mean here is that a “strong female character” could be a fully fleshed out, interesting character who is weak, insecure, and submissive – a “strongly written female character”, even if not a physically, mentally, or emotionally strong person.

      And I think this breaks down into yet another set of distinctions that became clear to me at an informal workshop on feminist pedagogy. Everyone who came to the meeting had a different type of issue to tackle, so we ended up speaking across each other a good amount of the time. By the end, I realized that there were at least 6 different pieces of the puzzle, though some are easily collapsible:

      1. Teaching as a feminist, when your students know you have feminist ideals.
      2. Teaching in a feminist way, when you actively try to make your class a safe space for people of all gender-identities and use neutral pronouns and make sure you use sources that are diverse, etc.
      3. Teaching about feminism, which is fairly self-explanatory.
      4. Teaching as a feminine person, meaning, as a person who presents in a clearly feminine way (regardless of sex). I’ve encountered some students who upon entering their first philosophy class were expecting Dumbledore, and were clearly confused by my 20-something female presence.
      5. Teaching in a feminine style, meaning in a way that is nurturing, and other stereotypes that of course are not universally split by gender or sex, but which are often not associated with teaching at the university level.
      6. Teaching about femininity or uniquely female concerns, which is often difficult to distinguish from teaching about feminism.

      While there is certainly significant overlap between all of these categories, I think it’s important to recognize the different challenges that come with each distinction. I think the same is true for writing – I think the issue is a lot more complicated than merely the presence or absence of strong female characters. And as shown in Linda Holmes’ article on NPR’s website, the issue goes beyond how we see women and girls, but includes how we represent male characters and how story-telling reflects our cultural expectations of masculinity.

      To rethink my six categories from above in terms of writing, feminism, and femininity, in particular:

      1. Writing as a feminist: this is the issue of identifying as a feminist, and how that colors people’s perceptions of your writing. If you openly identify as a feminist, even non-political writing can be perceived as being part of an agenda.
      2. Writing in a feminist way: using your words and stories to actively challenge gender stereotypes, reductionist objectification, heteronormativity, and more.
      3. Writing about feminism: actively tackling a feminist issue, creating a story where people act in ways to posit alternative norms, openly challenging gender stereotypes, and more.
      4. Writing as a feminine person: facing the challenges of writing as a female or feminine person, and dealing with the perceptions that arise simply based on what people know about you. There’s a prevalent perception, for example, that men/boys won’t read books written by women, so historically female authors have adopted pen names or used initials to cover their gendered given names.
      5. Writing in a feminine way: there are enculturated stylistic differences in the way traditional and stereotypical women and men write. Feminine writing traits include the over-use of qualifiers (guilty), more introspection, a nurturing style of character growth, a deeper focus on emotional responses, and other things, while masculine writing is stereotypically characterized by stronger plot movement, a greater focus on action, and a more confident, declarative style. Of course, it’s a false dichotomy, and very few people – if any – actually fit neatly into one side or the other, but the general perception remains.
      6. Writing about femininity or issues that pertain uniquely to women/girls: this one is probably worth splitting again, as it focuses both on writing about traditionally feminine characteristics, issues, and values, and writing about the unique issues of women/girls themselves (child birth, relative societal pressures, etc). Sometimes this is called “chick lit” or “pink lit” and it’s often seen as frivolous. “Strong female characters” are often portrayed as being above this sort of stuff, as if they are too cool to care about clothes, feelings, romance, and other (again, stereotypically – clearly I’m a fan of the qualifier) feminine things. They’re also often too cool to care about, or are appropriately embarrassed by, or are preternaturally able to rise above uniquely feminine concerns.

      I don’t think there’s any one way to do it “right”, or that any one of these categories is more important than another, or that feminism and femininity are mutually exclusive, or whatever people might assume. Even though (one more time with the qualifiers) these categories easily sift through each other, I think keeping these distinctions in mind could help clarify a lot of the debates we see about the representation of women in stories, and help us see nuance and diverse possibility in “the strong female character”.

      Posted in The Waste Book | 0 Comments | Tagged femininity, feminism, gender, links, strong female character, writing
    • Looking for Something?

    • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

      Join 422 other followers

    • Follow on Bloglovin
    • Popular Posts & Pages

      • The Writers Roast
      • About my Soliloquies
      • A Bit of Winter Hygge
      • Of Physical Laws and Fictional Characters
      • For Ever, and Ever, and Ever
      • Why the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge is a Good Thing
      • The Philosopher's Lexicon: Apophatic Theology
      • The Blacksmith's Apprentice: a Poem
      • 30 Days of Painting, Day 1: Floral Vine and Lace Doodles
      • 30 Days of Painting, Day 28: Sunset Colors
    • Tags

      academia acrylic acrylics aquinas arendt art Augustine awards beach books C.S. Lewis christmas definitions dictionary editing ephemerality epistemology favorite words feynman Fiction film food god harry potter history husserl hygge illustration kindle language learning lexicon libraries links list literary time consciousness literature logic longreads magic medieval Metaphysics music myth my work NaNoWriMo nature painting pensieve philosopher fridays philosophy photography Plato poetry reading reason reblog religion Rousseau science snow spring stories storytelling syllabus temporality theology time tolkien trees vikings vocabulary water colors words writing
    • The Archives

    • top blog sites
      top blog sites

Blog at WordPress.com.

Cancel

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Loading Comments...
Comment
    ×
    Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
    To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy